Talk:NSABP P-1

Other references

Here's a good one:

• http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11795386

--Dave Iberri 11:21, 22 October 2012 (PDT)

annually versus study duration

Anyone feel strongly about listing outcomes as annually versus during the study duration? I think that annually is likely more appropriate for all outcomes listed since most are listed only in that format. Thoughts? --Tim Plante 10:20, 25 October 2012 (PDT)

Seems reasonable. Can you post an example here? --Dave Iberri 13:07, 25 October 2012 (PDT)

Example:

Invasive breast cancer

Cumulatively: 22 vs. 43.4 per 1,000 (RR 0.50; 95% CI not given; P<0.00001)

Annually: 3.43 vs. 6.76 per 1,000 (RR 0.51; 95% CI 0.39-0.66; P not given)

(see table 3 for annual rates)

--Tim Plante18:22, 25 October 2012 (PDT)

Yeah, maybe we should just leave it at annuallly. --Dave Iberri 20:54, 25 October 2012 (PDT)