ACST-1: Difference between revisions

Jump to navigation Jump to search
409 bytes added ,  17 October 2015
no edit summary
No edit summary
Tag: visualeditor
No edit summary
Tag: visualeditor
Line 4: Line 4:


==Bottom Line==
==Bottom Line==
<!-- What is the one thing you would want to take away from this article? Again, the ACCORD's bottom line is shown below, but you should replace it with yours. -->
In asymptomatic patients <75 years of age with asymptomatic significant carotid artery stenosis (≥60%), successful immediate CEA reduces 10-year risk of stroke without a significant increase in peri-operative mortality and morbidity as compared to deferred CEA.<!-- What is the one thing you would want to take away from this article? Again, the ACCORD's bottom line is shown below, but you should replace it with yours. -->


==Major Points==
==Major Points==
The stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1) randomized 3,120 patients to assess the effect of immediate CEA on stroke risk as compared to deferred CEA.
The stroke prevention after successful carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic stenosis (ACST-1) randomized 3,120 patients to assess the effect of immediate CEA on stroke risk as compared to deferred CEA.


Successful immediate CEA for asymptomatic patients <75 years of age at entry of trial reduces 10-year risk of stroke.<!-- Now write a succinct paragraph or two describing the major points in the article. Again, ACCORD's major points: -->
In asymptomatic patients <75 years of age with asymptomatic significant carotid artery stenosis (≥60%), successful immediate CEA reduces 10-year risk of stroke without a significant increase in peri-operative mortality and morbidity as compared to deferred CEA.<!-- Now write a succinct paragraph or two describing the major points in the article. Again, ACCORD's major points: -->


==Guidelines==
==Guidelines==
1,174

edits

Navigation menu