- 1 Clinical Question
- 2 Bottom Line
- 3 Major Points
- 4 Guidelines
- 5 Design
- 6 Population
- 7 Interventions
- 8 Outcomes
- 9 Criticisms
- 10 Funding
- 11 Further Reading
In patients with T2DM, CKD stage 2-3, and elevated urine albumin:creatinine, does the addition of an ACE inhibitor to ARB therapy prevent eGFR reduction, ESRD, or death?
Among patients with T2DM, CKD stage 2-3, and elevated urine albumin:creatinine ratio, the addition of an ACE inhibitor to ARB therapy does not prevent eGFR reduction, ESRD, or death. Additionally, combination therapy is associated with increased rates of AKI and hyperkalemia.
The 1993 CSG Captopril Trial demonstrated that the ACE inhibitor captopril prevented progression of DM nephropathy in patients with T1DM. The 2001 RENAAL trial demonstrated efficacy of the ARB losartan in patients with T2DM nephropathy. Whether adding an ACE inhibitor to ARB therapy would provide further benefit in T2DM with DM nephropathy and was unknown.
The 2013 Veterans Affairs Nephropathy in Diabetes (VA NEPHRON-D) trial enrolled 1,448 patients with T2DM and DM nephropathy defined by urine albumin:creatinine ratio ≥300 and CKD stage 2-3. Participants were randomized to losartan 100 mg PO qday plus either lisinopril 10-40 mg PO qday or placebo. With a median follow-up of 2.2 years, the trial was stopped early when an interim safety analysis demonstrated increased rates of hyperkalemia (4.4% vs. 9.9%; NNH 18) and AKI (11.0% vs. 18.0%; NNH 14) with combination therapy. There was no benefit for the primary endpoint of reduction eGFR, ESRD, or death. Participants on combination therapy did experience a greater reduction in albuminuria, raising the question of adequacy of this test as a surrogate for diabetic nephropathy outcomes.
VA-NEPHRON D joins multiple other studies demonstrating the lack of benefit and increased risk of complications with combination ACE inhibitor and ARB therapy for multiple conditions, most notably ONTARGET (2008, high risk CVD). Similarly, the 2012 ALTITUDE trial showed no benefit but increased risk with the addition of the direct renin inhibitor aliskiren to either an ACE inhibitor or ARB in patients with T2DM.
As of May 2014, no guidelines have been published that reflect the results of this trial.
- Multi-centered, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial
- Losartan (n=724)
- Losartan+lisinopril (n=724)
- Setting: 32 Veterans Affairs medical centers
- Enrollment: 2008-2012 (stopped early)
- Analysis: intention-to-treat
- Median follow-up: 2.2 years
- Primary efficacy outcome: First occurrence of decreased eGFR, ESRD, or death
- Primary safety outcome: Hyperkalemia and acute kidney injury
- Previously diagnosis of T2DM
- CKD stage 2-3 (eGFR of 30-89.9ml/min per 1.73 m2 of body surface area as calculated by the MDRD formula)
- Random urinary albumin:creatinine ≥300
- Known non-diabetic kidney disease
- Serum potassium >5.5 mmol/L
- Current treatment with sodium polystyrene sulfonate
- Inability to stop prescribed medications that increase risk of hyperkalemia
From the losartan group. Groups were similar.
- Demographics: Age 65 years, male 99.6%
- Race: White 73%, Black 24%, other 3%
- Hispanic: 10%
- Baseline health data: BMI 34 kg/m2, BP 137/72 mmHg
- PMH: CAD 23%, HF 15%, retinopathy 43%
- Baseline medications:
- BP-medications: Diuretic 70%, CCB 57%, beta-blocker 69%, alpha-blocker 22%, other 20%
- Either study medication classes at baseline: ACE-inhibitor 70%, ARB 16%, both 5%, neither 8%
- Baseline labs: Tchol 159 mg/dL, LDL 84 mg/dL, HDL 39 mg/dL, TG 162 mg/dL, hgb a1c 7.8%, potassium 4.3 mmol/L
- Renal specific:
- Creatinine 1.5 mg/dL
- GFR 54 mL/min/1.73 m2
- 30-44.9 mL/min/1.73 m2: 30%
- 45-59.9 mL/min/1.73 m2: 33%
- ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2: 38%
- Urine albumin:creatinine: 862
- Urine protein:creatinine: 1.6
- Renal specific:
- All participants had their ACE inhibitors or ARBs discontinued and were started on losartan 50 mg/day, increased to 100 mg/day if potassium <5.5 mmol/L and creatinine did not increase by >30%
- After 30 days on the full dose of the medication, patients without adverse events were randomized to a group with stratification by site, GFR, proteinuria, and ACE inhibitor/ARB dual therapy at enrollment:
- Losartan plus placebo
- Losartan plus lisinopril
- Lisinopril or its placebo dosing was increased every two weeks from 10 mg/day to 20 mg/day to 40 mg/day as long as no side effects and as long as creatinine remained <5.5 mmol/L and creatinine did not increase by >30% from baseline
- BP medications were modified to target SBP 110-130 mmHg and DBP <80 mmHg
- Potassium 5-6 mmol/L managed by dietary modifications, diuretics, and other medications
Comparisons are losartan vs. losartan+lisinopril.
- First occurrence of change in eGFR, ESRD, and death
- Change in eGFR defined as decrease ≥30 mL/min/1.73 m2 if eGFR ≥60 mL/min/1.73 m2 or relative decrease ≥50% confirmed >4 weeks after treatment of potentially reversible factors.
- 21.0% vs. 18.2% (HR 0.88; 0.70-1.12; P=0.30)
- First occurrence of change in eGFR and ESRD
- 14.0% vs. 10.6% (HR 0.78; 0.58-1.05; P=0.10)
- Safety outcomes
- All-cause mortality: 8.3% vs. 8.7% (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.73-1.49; P=0.75)
- Serious adverse events: 52.5% vs. 57.5% (P=0.06)
- Attributed to study medications, % of all: 0.9% vs. 1.8% (P is significant though not given)
- Hyperkalemia: 4.4% vs. 9.9% (HR 2.8; 95% CI 1.8-4.3; P<0.001; NNH 18)
- Potassium >6mmol/L or requiring ED visit, hospitalization, or HD.
- AKI: 11.0% vs. 18.0% (HR 1.7; 95% CI 1.3-2.2; P<0.001; NNH 14)
- Requiring hospitalization or occurring during a hospitalization.
- MI, HF, or stroke
- 18.8% vs. 18.5% (HR 0.97; 95% CI 0.76-1.23; P=0.79)
- Individual components of composite outcomes
- ESRD: 5.9% vs. 3.7% (HR 0.66; 95% CI 0.41-1.07; P=0.07)
- HF: 14.6% vs. 12.3% (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.62-.109; P=0.17)
- Stroke: 2.5% vs. 2.5% (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.52-1.85; P=0.95)
- eGFR over time
- -2.9 vs. -2.7 ml/min/1.73 m2/year (P=0.17)
- Decline in albumin
- creatinine from randomization to 1 year
- Greater reduction with losartan+lisinopril
- 829 to 701 vs. 786 to 517 (P<0.001)
- Serious adverse events
- Atrial arrhythmias: 2.3% vs. 2.9%
- Hypertension: 1.7% vs. 1.7%
- Hypotension: 1.9% vs. 1.7%
- Fall: 2.8% vs. 2.3%
- Syncope: 1.2% vs. 1.4%
- Hyperglycemia: 2.3% vs. 1.7%
- Hypoglycemia: 3.0% vs. 2.8%
- GIB: 1.4% vs. 3.3%
- Anemia: 1.9% vs. 2.5%
- COPD: 3.3% vs. 2.3%
- Dyspnea: 1.4% vs. 0.3%
- Respiratory failure: 1.5% vs. 1.2%
- Taking lisinopril at ≥10 mg or its placebo daily at end of the dose-adjustment period
- 83.9% vs. 79.3%
There was no difference for the primary outcome for predefined subgroups including eGFR ≥ or <60 mL/min/1.73 m2, albuminuria ≥ or <1 g/gram creatinine, history of prior dual ACE inhibitor/ARB therapy, age ≥ or <65 years, and race.
- Stopped early so underpowered for primary outcome analysis
- Essentially zero female participants precludes generalizability
- Poor outcomes may be related to the high dose of the medications rather than the fact that multiple classes are used
- Given that ACE inhibitors are mostly excreted by the kidney and ARBs are mostly excreted through the biliary system, starting with ACE inhibitors first with an ARB add-on may have delineated patients who were unlikely to tolerate dual therapy without an uncontrollable reduction in renal function
- Unclear definition of AKI
- Unclear clinical significance of a potassium level of 6 to 6.5 mmol/L
- The predefined subgroups did not include many groups of clinical importance including uncontrolled HTN, HF, and severe proteinuria
- The target SBPs of 110-130 mmHg have not been shown to be associated with better outcomes in diabetics
Cooperative Studies Program of the Department of Veterans Affairs Office of Research and Development
- de Zeeuw D. "Editorial: The end of dual therapy with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system blockade?" The New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(20):1960-1962.
- Parving HH, et al. "Cardiorenal end points in a trial of aliskiren for type 2 diabetes." The New England Journal of Medicine. 2012:367(23):2204-2213.
- International Conference on Harmonisation Guideline on Clinical Safety Data Management: Definitions and standards for expedited reporting. Federal Register. 1995;60(40)11284-11287.
- Multiple authors. "Correspondence: Combined angiotensin inhibition in diabetic nephropathy." The New England Journal of Medicine. 2014:370:777-779.