CLARINET Study
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Caplin ME, et al. "Lanreotide in metastatic enteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors". New England Journal of Medicine. 2014. 371(3):224-233.
PubMed • Full text
PubMed • Full text
[[Category:]]
Bottom Line
Major Points
Guidelines
Design
- Phase III, multicentre, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial
- N=204
- Lanreotide (n=101)
- Placebo (n=103)
- Setting: 48 sites in 14 countries
- Enrollment: 2006-2013
- Screening 12-24w; CT/MRI between that period x2
- Analysis: Intention-to-treat
- Primary outcome: PFS
Population
Inclusion Criteria
- Adults (≥18 years of age) with sporadic neuroendocrine tumors
- Confirmed centrally to be well differentiated or moderately differentiated and measurable
- Tumors had a centrally assessed proliferation index (Ki-67 antigen < 10%)
- Primary tumors in the pancreas, midgut, or hindgut or were of unknown origin.
- Tumors were nonfunctioning, except for gastrinomas adequately treated
- Unresectable locally advanced tumor or metastatic disease (or the patient declined surgery), target lesion/s that were classified on somatostatin-receptor scintigraphy as grade 2 or higher
Exclusion Criteria
- Treatment with IFN, chemoembolization, or chemotherapy within 6 months before study entry,
- Radionuclide at any time, or a somatostatin analogue at any time
- Major surgery related to the neuroendocrine tumor within 3 months before study entry
- Multiple endocrine neoplasia
- Previous cancer (except treated or untreated in situ cervical or uterine carcinoma or basal-cell skin carcinoma or patients with other cancers who had been treated with curative intent and had been disease-free for >5 years)
Baseline Characteristics
Baseline Characteristics All data for lanreotide vs placebo
- Males: 52% vs 52%
- Age: 63.3+/-9.8 vs 62.2+/-11.1
- Time since diagnosis: 32.6+/-46.1 vs 34.4+/-41.4
- Prior treatment for NET: 16% vs 16%
- Primary tumour resected: 40% vs 38%
- Origin of NET Pancreas: 42% vs 48%
- Origin of NET Midgut: 33% vs 39%
- Origin of NET Hindgut: 11% vs 3%
- Origin of NET Unknown/Other: 15% vs 11%
- Tumour progression: 4% vs 5%
- Tumour grade Ki-67 0-2%: 68% vs 70%
- Tumour grade Ki-67 3-10%: 32% vs 28%
- Tumour grade data missing: 0% vs 2%
Interventions
- Extended-release aqueous-gel formulation of lanreotide (Autogel [known in the United States as Depot]), at a dose of 120 mg, or placebo (sodium chloride) was administered, without dose adjustment, by means of deep subcutaneous injection every 28 days (to a maximum of 24 injections).
- Study visits were scheduled during the screening period and at weeks 1 (baseline), 12, 24, 36, 48, 72, and 96.
- Single scans were obtained at all post-baseline visits.
Outcomes
Comparisons are lanrotide vs. placebo
Primary Outcomes
- PFS was significantly prolonged with lanreotide vs placebo in the primary analysis
- Median PFS, not reached vs. 18.0 months, P<0.001 stratified log-rank test;
- HR for progression / death, 0.47; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30 to 0.73, p=0.0002
Secondary Outcomes
- Patients alive without disease progression wk 48 - (%): 66% vs 49% (OR 2.11 95%CI 1.19 to 3.76), P<0.05, NNT=5.9)
- Patients alive without disease progression wk 96 - (%): 52% vs 25% (OR 3.27 95%CI 1.81 to 5.93), P<0.001, NNT=3.7)
- Overall survival: 19 vs 17 deaths not signifcant
- Median TTP: Not reached vs 18m (12.1-24)m
- EORTC QLQ-C30 Global HS Score: −5.18±3.73 vs −4.87±3.7 Least squares mean difference −0.31±2.74 (−5.73 to 5.10)
- Patients with ≥50% reduction in level of chromogranin A from baseline to last post-baseline level available (%): 42% vs 5% (OR 15.20 95% CI 4.29 to 53.87, P<0.001, NTT=2.7)
Subgroup Analysis
Adverse Events
- Any adverse event: 88% vs. 90%
- Any adverse event related to study treatment: 50% vs. 28%
- Any adverse event according to intensity
- Severe: 26% vs. 31%
- Moderate: 44% vs. 43%
- Mild: 17% vs. 17%
- Any serious adverse event: 25% vs. 31%
- Serious adverse event related to study treatment: 3% vs. 1%
- Withdrawal from study because of any adverse event: 3% vs. 3%
- Withdrawal because of adverse event related to study treatment: 1% vs. 0%