MENDS
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Pandharipande PP, et al. "Effect of sedation with dexmedetomidine vs lorazepam on acute brain dysfunction in mechanically ventilated patients: the MENDS randomized controlled trial". JAMA. 2007. 298(22):2644-2653.
PubMed • Full text
PubMed • Full text
Clinical Question
Among adult mechanically ventilated ICU patients, does dexmedetomidine for sedation reduce duration of delirium and coma as compared to lorazepam?
Bottom Line
As compared to lorazepam, dexmedetomidine resulted in less delirium & coma but this may not have been an equal comparison.
Major Points
To provide care to the critically ill requiring mechanical ventilation, sedation is required.
Guidelines
As of April 2022, no guidelines have been published that reflect the results of this trial.
Design
- Multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial
- N=106
- Dexmedetomidine (n=54)
- Lorazepam (n=52)
- Setting: 2 tertiary medical centers in USA
- Enrollment: August 2004 to April 2006
- Follow-up: 1 year
- Analysis: Intention-to-treat
- Primary Outcome: Days alive without delirium/coma; percentage of days spent within 1 RASS point of sedation goal
Population
Inclusion Criteria
- Adult (age ≥18 years)
- Intubated and requiring mechanical ventilation for >24 hours
Exclusion Criteria
- Neurological disease: Previous stroke, Cerebral Palsy, severe dementia, etc
- Active Seizure
- Childs-Pugh Class B or C liver dysfunction
- Moribund state with planned withdraw of life support
- Family or Physician refusal
- Alcohol abuse
- benzodiazepine dependency
- Active MI
- Second or Third degree heart block
- Pregnancy or Lactating
- Severe hearing disabilities
- inability to understand English
Baseline Characteristics
Dexmedetomidine Group displayed
- Demographics: Median age 60, 42% female
- Disease severity: median APACHE II 29, median SOFA 10
- ICU type: 29% surgical, 71% medical
- Characteristics at enrollments: median total lorazepam exposure 0.25mg, median duration of mechanical ventilation 22h, RASS -3
- ICU Admission diagnosis: 37% sepsis / ARDS, 23% other pulmonary, 8% malignancy, 6% ENT, 4% acuite lung injury, 4% COPD, 4% cardiogenic shock, 2% hemorrhagic shock, 2% renal failure, 10% other
Interventions
- Dexmedetomidine, 0.15-1.5 mcg/kg/h, titrated by the bedside nurse to achieve target sedation goal (RASS), until extubation or 120 hours (maximum time set by the FDA)
- Lorazepam 1-10 mg/h, titrated by the bedside nurse to achieve target sedation goal (RASS), until extubation or 120 hours (maximum time set by the FDA)
Outcomes
Comparisons are demedetomidine vs. lorazepam.
Primary Outcomes
- Delirium & coma free days (up to study day 12)
- 7 vs. 3 (p=.01)
- Percentage of days spent within 1 RASS point of sedation goal (up to study day 12)
- 80% vs. 67% (p=.04)
Secondary Outcomes
- Prevalence of delirium or coma
- 87% vs. 98% (p=.03)
- Prevalence of delirium
- 79% vs. 82% (p=.65)
- Prevalence of coma
- 63% vs. 92% (p<.001)
- Mechanical ventilator-free days
- 22 vs. 18 (p=.22)
- Intensive care unit length of stay
- 7.5 days vs. 9 days (p=.92)
- 28-day mortality
- 18% vs. 27% (p=.18)
- Completion of post-ICU neurological testing from enrollment date
- 7 days vs. 9 days (p=NS)
- Median fentanyl exposure, mcg/day
- 575 vs. 150 (p=.006)
- Use of antipsychotics
- 46% vs. 35% (p=.26)
- Use of propofol
- 7% vs. 4% (p=.36)
Subgroup Analysis
- Delirium free days (up to study day 12)
- 9 vs. 7 (p=.09)
- Coma free days (up to study day 12)
- 10 vs. 8 (p<.001)
Adverse Events
- Sinus bradycardia
- 17% vs. 4% (p=.03)
All other safety outcomes were similar between groups
Criticisms
- comparison to lorazepam as a continuous infusion instead of bolus dosing may have presented an unbalanced comparison
- The longer duration of action of lorazepam may have led to over-sedation as compared to dexmedetomidine, and affected clearance of coma
- pain managed by nursing assessment, not by objective measure
- more fentanyl used in the dexmedetomidine group may have been due to its sedating properties to help maintain RASS
Funding
- Unrestricted research grant for laboratory and investigational studies from Hospira Inc