Preoperative versus Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy for Rectal Cancer
PubMed • Full text • PDF
Clinical Question
Among patients with locally advanced resectable rectal cancer (T3/4, any N), does preoperative chemoradiotherapy improve overall survival or disease recurrence compared to postoperative chemoradiotherapy?
Bottom Line
In patients with locally advanced rectal cancer, preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly reduced the 5-year local recurrence rate compared to postoperative chemoradiotherapy (6% vs. 13%), and was associated with reduced treatment toxicity. There was no difference in 5-year overall or disease-free survival.
Major Points
The German Rectal Cancer Trial (CAO/ARO/AIO-94) was the first randomized phase III trial to compare long-course preoperative vs. postoperative chemoradiotherapy in patients with resectable, locally advanced rectal cancer (T3/4, any N). It found that preoperative chemoradiotherapy significantly reduced the 5-year cumulative incidence of local recurrence from 13% in the post-operative treatment group to 6%. In long-term follow-up, this benefit persisted, with the 10-year local recurrence rate remaining lower in the preoperative group (7% vs. 10%) [1]. Additionally, the trial demonstrated neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy was better tolerated (reduced acute and long term toxicity) and improved patient adherence to the treatment regimen. These results were later mirrored in short-course trials and helped establish preoperative chemoradiotherapy as a foundational component of total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for rectal cancer.
Guidelines
- American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2024 Rectal cancer guidelines: The German rectal cancer trial establishes the use of 28 cycles of 5040 cGy reduces local recurrence and toxicity
- National Comprehensive Care Network (NCCN) v2.2025
Design
- Trial Type: Randomized, multicenter, open-label, phase III trial
- N: 823 patients randomized
- Experimental Arm (N = 405) Preoperative chemoradiotherapy
- Standard Arm (N = 394): Postoperative chemoradiotherapy
- Setting: 26 academic or regional centers with experience in rectal cancer surgery in Germany and Austria
- Enrollment: February 1995 – September 2002
- Mean Follow-up: Median 46 months (range 3–102)
- Analysis: Intention-to-treat
- Per-treatment analysis for toxicity
- Primary Outcome: Overall survival
- Secondary Outcomes:
- Cumulative incidence of local recurrence
- Disease-free survival
- Grade 3–4 acute and long-term toxicity
- Sphincter preservation in patients initially deemed to require abdominoperineal resection
Population
Inclusion Criteria
- Age ≥ 18 years
- Histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the rectum
- Tumor located ≤16 cm from the anal verge by rigid proctoscopy
- Clinical stage T3 or T4 and/or node-positive disease
- Determined by endorectal ultrasound or CT scan
- No evidence of distant metastasis (M0)
- Medically fit for both chemoradiotherapy and surgery
Exclusion Criteria
- Age >75 years
- Prior cancer other than nonmelanoma skin cancer
- Prior chemotherapy
- Prior radiotherapy to the pelvis
- Distant metastases (M1 disease)
- Contraindications to chemoradiotherapy
Baseline Characteristics
"Preoperative Radiation Cohort "
- Age
- Median: 62 years (30–76)
- Sex
- Male: 286 (71%)
- Female: 119 (29%)
- Clinical tumor category
- T1/T2: 19 (5%)
- T3: 277 (68%)
- T4: 23 (6%)
- Unknown: 86 (21%)
- Nodal category
- Node-negative: 168 (41%)
- Node-positive: 217 (54%)
- Unknown: 20 (5%)
- Distance of tumor from anal verge
- <5 cm: 157 (39%)
- 5–10 cm: 166 (41%)
- >10 cm: 47 (12%)
- Unknown: 35 (9%)
Interventions
- Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy Arm
- Chemoradiotherapy: 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 5 days per week + 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) 1000 mg/m²/day by continuous infusion during weeks 1 and 4
- Total mesorectal excision: 6 weeks after completion of chemoradiotherapy
- Postoperative Chemoradiotherapy Arm
- Upfront total mesorectal excision
- Postoperative chemoradiotherapy: 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions, 5 days per week + 5-FU 1000 mg/m²/day by continuous infusion during weeks 1 and 4, starting 4 weeks postoperatively
- Both groups received postoperative chemotherapy: Four cycles of 5-FU
Outcomes
"Comparisons are preoperative chemoradiotherapy vs. postoperative chemoradiotherapy"
Primary Outcome
- Overall survival at 5 years
- 76% vs. 74% (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.70–1.31; P = 0.80)
Secondary Outcomes
- Local recurrence at 5 years
- 6% vs. 13% (HR 0.46; 95% CI 0.26–0.82; P = 0.006)
- Disease-free survival at 5 years
- 68% vs. 65% (HR 0.87; 95% CI 0.67–1.14; P = 0.32)
- Distant Recurrence
- 36% vs. 38% (RR 0.97; 95% CI 0.73–1.28; P = 0.84)
- Grade 3–4 acute toxicity
- 27% vs. 40% (P = 0.001)
- Grade 3–4 long-term toxicity
- 14% vs. 24% (P = 0.01)
Subgroup Analysis
- N=194 patients determined to require APR pre-randomization
- Sphincter preservation
- (45/116) 39% vs. (15/78) 19% (P = 0.004)
Adverse Events
- 8 patients (4 per group) experienced in hospital mortality (1%)
Criticisms
- This trial did not include the addition of oxaliplatin to 5-FU, which is more common in modern regimens
- 5-FU was delivered by continuous infusion rather than oral capecitabine, which is more common today.
- Staging was not performed with MRI, which may have better stratified pre-treatment stage
- Sphincter preservation was based on subgroup analysis and based on surgeon judgement without MRI technology, which may limit applicability to modern practice.
Funding
- Supported by the German Cancer Society (Deutsche Krebshilfe)
Further Reading
This should usually just contain a single <references />
piece of markup which will list all citations references in the main text of the article entry.