Bots, editor, reviewer, Administrators
13,951
edits
Feed:All articles/Pretty: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1,984: | Line 1,984: | ||
}, | }, | ||
{ | { | ||
"timestamp" : " | "timestamp" : "2014-05-14T05:50:30Z", | ||
"briefDesignDescription" : "Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in ACS", | "briefDesignDescription" : "Ticagrelor vs. clopidogrel in ACS", | ||
"fulltexturl" : "http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0904327", | "fulltexturl" : "http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa0904327", | ||
| Line 2,126: | Line 2,126: | ||
"title" : "Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection.", | "title" : "Three months of rifapentine and isoniazid for latent tuberculosis infection.", | ||
"pmid" : "22150035" | "pmid" : "22150035" | ||
}, | |||
{ | |||
"timestamp" : "2014-05-14T01:16:03Z", | |||
"briefDesignDescription" : "EGDT vs. standard protocol vs. usual care for septic shock", | |||
"fulltexturl" : "http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMoa1401602", | |||
"pageid" : 1782, | |||
"pdfurl" : "http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJMoa1401602", | |||
"trainingLevel" : "Intern", | |||
"citation" : "Angus DC, <i>et al</i>. \"A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock\". <i>The New England Journal of Medicine</i>. 2014. 370(10):1683-1693.", | |||
"subspecialties" : "Critical Care", | |||
"expansion" : "Protocolized Care for Early Septic Shock", | |||
"briefResultsDescription" : "No difference for EGDT vs. standard protocol vs. usual care for septic shock", | |||
"published" : "2014-05-01", | |||
"pageName" : "ProCESS", | |||
"diseases" : "Sepsis", | |||
"abbreviation" : "ProCESS", | |||
"title" : "A randomized trial of protocol-based care for early septic shock", | |||
"pmid" : "24635773" | |||
}, | }, | ||
{ | { | ||